Options, Costs and Strategies for CO2 Reductions in the European Power Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/esr.v11i2.445Abstract
Given its high share of total CO2 emissions power generation is a key sector for seeking CO2 reduction options. The purpose of this paper is to provide a power generator eye view of the European powersector'sCO2 compliance decision process under a mandatory emissions reduction program. The analysis indicates that in the medium term many European generators are likely to seriously consider options that are based on traditional power technologies such as converting existing coal-fired capacity to bum gas as well, extending the lives of nuclear capacity, and replacing old inefficient coal-fired plants with more efficient gas- or even coal-fired units. In the long-term the economic potential of future mitigation options are highly uncertain, and generators are likely to respond to this uncertainty by maintaining flexibility in fuel choices and avoiding large investments that lock them into a specific compliance method before new, more efficient technologies and fuels, have crystallized. Most notably, if the costs of carbon sequestration are expected to go down coal can be considered a sustainable energy source, and there may be weak incentives for generators to switch from coal to other fuels in the medium term. Given the multitude of possible CO2 mitigation options in the power sector, there is a strong case for emissions trading and for refraining from policies that build on mandatory fuel requirements, higher rates of capital stock turnover and technology standards.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Rights for Authors
As further described in our submission agreement (the Submission Agreement), in consideration for publication of the article, the authors assign to Energy Studies Review all copyright in the article, subject to the expansive personal--use exceptions described below.
Attribution and Usage Policies
Reproduction, posting, transmission or other distribution or use of the article or any material therein, in any medium as permitted by a personal-use exemption or by written agreement of Energy Studies Review, requires credit to Energy Studies Review as copyright holder (e.g., Energy Studies Review © 2014).
Personal-use Exceptions
The following uses are always permitted to the author(s) and do not require further permission from DigitalCommons@McMaster provided the author does not alter the format or content of the articles, including the copyright notification:
- Storage and back-up of the article on the author's computer(s) and digital media (e.g., diskettes, back-up servers, Zip disks, etc.), provided that the article stored on these computers and media is not readily accessible by persons other than the author(s);
- Posting of the article on the author(s) personal website, provided that the website is non-commercial;
- Posting of the article on the internet as part of a non-commercial open access institutional repository or other non-commercial open access publication site affiliated with the author(s)'s place of employment (e.g., a Phrenology professor at the University of Southern North Dakota can have her article appear in the University of Southern North Dakota's Department of Phrenology online publication series); and
- Posting of the article on a non-commercial course website for a course being taught by the author at the university or college employing the author.
People seeking an exception, or who have questions about use, should contact the editors.